Civil Liberties‘ my arse! This group is and has been one of the most destructive organizations this country has ever seen…filled with nothing but swarms of commie critters as far as I’m concerned. When are we ever going to get rid of this group? Will we ever be able to get rid of this group and their power? The only way I see the majority in this country of being able to diminish their power and eventually dismantle them altogether is via tort reform laws, (another reason we must vote and take control this election)…but that’s just me.

Friends…check out this latest report regarding where these filthy critters have inserted themselves once again…it’s beyond belief at times…and this is one of those times!

This is why my flakes are so frosted…this is via TB:

Rhode Island dominated headlines earlier this year after a teen atheist successfully sued to have a prayer mural removed from Cranston High School West in Cranston, Rhode Island. Now, there’s two new targets within the very same school district: Father-daughter dances and mother-son baseball games.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has now successfully stopped gender-based events from unfolding. An effort to halt these practices took form after a mother, upset over the fact that her daughter doesn’t have an active father in her life and, thus, feels left out of the aforementioned dance, complained to the civil rights group.

In the end the ACLU was successful in nixing the dances and baseball games, as the school district very quickly bowed to its demands and cancelled both traditions. Cranston Public Schools Superintendent Judith Lundsten said that the events were being halted so that the district would be in compliance with state-gender discrimination law.

“I acknowledge that many of these events have long traditions and for many parents, these types of gender-based events are not an issue,” Lundsten wrote in a letter to school groups. “However, this is a public school system and under no circumstances should be isolating any child from full participation in school activities and events based on gender. Please be all-inclusive when planning your events.

Cranston Mayor Allan Fung said Tuesday he was “utterly disappointed” that the Cranston schools superintendent removed the events in what the mayor called “the name of political correctness” after the state affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union complained last spring.

School Committee Member Andrea Iannazzi also said the committee will consider at a Monday meeting a resolution asking the General Assembly to change state law to allow the events.

Visit for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

ACLU Executive Director Steven Brown has commended the school district for banning gender-based events and has called them inappropriate. Rather than serving as positive and traditional events that members of the community enjoy, Brown claimed that these initiatives play into gender stereotypes (i.e. dances being for girls and baseball games for boys).

“Not every girl today is interested in growing up to be Cinderella — not even in Cranston,” Brown said in a statement. ”In fact, one of them might make a great major league baseball player someday.”

Talk about tyranny…what’s happened here is nothing but that! Would someone please tell me how a ‘Father-Daughter Dance‘ or a ‘Mom-Son Baseball Game‘ is going to hurt any of America’s Civil Liberties?…I’ll wait to hear from you, in the meantime…I’m still steaming mad!

Fire Away – Inquiring Minds Want to Know!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



  1. bigtimer,
    I can tell you exactly how we can destroy this bunch, They are paid with tax payers money, If the people we send to Washington would cut off the flow of money to these parasites they would cease to exist. thats it, short and sweet.

    • Agreed…that’s a must. But they make money other ways too…we need tort reform for loser pays all costs from beginning to end of any court decision…then things will cease in a big way, including trial lawyers too.

  2. ACLU…………SCREW U……….rot in Hell

  3. They should all be rounded up and summarily shot. Lawyers practicing legal jihad on the constitution and the people should be prevented from operating across state lines. Also, check the names of the lawyers involved and you will probably find a nest of atheist joos running the show. I know I will get some heat for that but it is the truth with this group. Frack these communists bastids, they want to control everyone.

  4. The ACLU is one of the most destructive liberal-secular organizations in America. They are almost always on the wrong side of traditional values, and the few times they support a conservative cause is merely for show. Such ‘token’ cases on the part of the ACLU is to offset any criticism that they have a liberal agenda. But it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that their real purpose is to restrict American freedom, to make our nation bend to political-correctness and a liberal-Marxist idealogy. They too are one of the ‘enemies within.’

    One of the best books written on this subject is ‘The ACLU Vs. America’ by authors Alan Sears and Craig Osten (2005).

  5. yeah I have a message for them..

    Stop with the pretenses already and just admit that you are a bunch of communist, atheist, anti-American sons of bitches whose primary mission is to destroy American culture.. now go rape a beehive ya bastids

  6. These assholes are without shame……what the hell is going on in this country that we have to put up with this kind of bullshit……..

    Talk about stupid and reprehensible…..this takes the cake……..


  7. Spurwing Plover says:

    They should realy be called the ATHIESTS.COMMUNISTS & LAWYERS.UNDERGROUND since it was founded by a closet communsts AND ITS MAIN GOAL IT A SECULAR AMERICA

  8. Spurwing Plover says:

    The ACLU needs to stop using the image of LADY LIBERTY in their logo and use the RED STAR and HAMMER & PSCYLE instead

  9. Don’t blame the communist plaintiffs, blame the gutless school board. This was never litigated.

    • Gutless wonders come a dime a dozen…the ACLU count on them. They know the cost too many others across this land with a lawsuit and endless years of battling would be horrendous to many…they depend on it.

      These filthy bastids scout for anything and everything they can to destroy this great nation and the freedoms she once stood for…that’s the communist way. Marx, Alinsky, Cloward/Piven, Soros etc are all smiling with glee behind the scenes…including the empty-suit (and corhorts) we have in power now in DC.

      • bigtimer,I see where Soros fell out of the top 10 billionaires list.I hope that scumbag freefalls all the way to Hussein’s welfare roll.

        • You know what…I heard that list of the top ten yesterday, didn’t even think about Soros. You made my day by mentioning it.

          Unfortunately, we’ll never get rid of him now that his sons are in line to take over his evil ways. ~

  10. Steve Sybert says:

    I, too, have had enough of these commies in the ACLU. I’d like to know just whose civil liberties they are fighting for. It sure ain’t mine. How difficult would it have been for the girl-in-question to just invite her grand-dad, or an uncle? The rules aren’t THAt RIGID, are they?

  11. I have never understood why everyone is so afraid of the ACLU. The Cranston School Board folded as soon as the ACLU was mentioned, according to the article. They make the French look like courage personified. Why don’t people stand up to these @$$-clown lawyers, and just simply refuse to bow down to their frivolous lawsuits. Quite frankly, I’m surprised someone hasn’t met one of these lawyers with armed resistance. That’s going to be all that’s left if things keep going the way they are. And who will blame them? In their minds, they’ll just simply be protecting themselves, their loved ones, and their property; from these lawyers and “officers of the court” that are coming to steal from them.

    As for tort reform… It’ll never happen. Because lawyers profit too much from litigation. With each passing year more and more legal defenses in civil cases are removed. So that lawyers can sue more people, for more money. So they can cut a bigger slice. And our lawmakers are all too eager to allow this stuff to happen. Because what were most of them before they were lawmakers?… That’s right, LAWYERS!!! So I don’t think lawyers and their brethren in the state and federal legislatures are going to be slashing their own throats anytime soon.

    The government is not our friend. Why should the courts be any different?

    • Good points all…but I do have to disagree with you when you say tort reform will never happen. We were on the brink of that possibly happening back in ’05 (I think that it was that year) before Jumping Jeffords switched parties, as well as Spector who himself has jumped parties doing all they could to stop a successful vote to pass this in the Senate…now that we are getting more and more real conservatives in the House and Senate year after year since then…methinks we have a very good chance of accomplishing tort reform as long as we elect a repub prez…it’s a must!

      • Well if it happens, then awesome! I’ll be one of the first ones celebrating with you guys. But even if something like this does pass, and become law… there’s always the courts. People can always sue to have the courts block a law that’s been passed. I don’t think I have to tell you about the AZ immigration law. Or the Voter ID law. Or all these referendums that were voted on by the people in several states to keep Sharia Law from being recognized by our courts, only to have those courts strike down those elections as “unconstitutional” (don’t EVEN get me started on that so-called argument!).

        A lot of people, even in this day and age, know that the House and Senate have to pass a bill by a simple majority. Then the President either signs the bill, or vetoes it. And if the President vetoes the bill; if the House and Senate each have a 2/3 majority vote to override the veto, then the bill becomes law. HOWEVER, what most people seem to forget, is that at ANY time during or AFTER the legislative process, the Federal Court System can completely halt things dead in their tracks with ONE WORD: “unconstitutional.” And literally, their word is law.

        Ironically… the power of Judicial Review, deciding if things are “unconstitutional”… is not even in the Constitution. Or in any of the Amendments. The Constitution only gives the Supreme Court the power to interpret laws that are already passed. The Supreme Court just simply assumed this power (I believe it was around 1805, in Marbury vs. Madison). And with a few exceptions (i.e. Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War), nobody really questioned it. And it seems even less question it today.

        Call me cynical, and again if tort reform does in fact succeed, then I’ll be one of the first ones celebrating with you. But the Courts are not our friends. Especially the federal court system, who us citizens do NOT vote for, and once they’re appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, they’re there for life. The will of the people just are not part of the equation for these judges.

        • I know full-well where you’re coming from…but until if and when that scenario happened and it reaches SCOTUS that would be the law of the land. – One more reason we need to take power in the all three branches…SC Judges are a must for us to be able to appoint.

          Sorry if this sounds jumbled…but bet you’re following what I mean. (I’m tired, had a long day…just like many of ya)

          Btw…If conservatives don’t take power for decades long after I’m dead and gone to rid ourselves of activist judges across this land, along with trial lawyers via tort reform this nation is done.


    Its said that demacratic presidetiual canadate DUKAKIS lost the election becuase he was a caed carying member of the ACLU

  13. What does tort reform have to do with the ACLU?? Tort lawsuits are instituted to collect damages for personal injuries caused by negligence, like auto accidents or defective products. It has absolutely no effect on these lawsuits filed by the ACLU. And why should there be federal tort reform imposed on all of the states? This is a state matter that should be left to the individual states.

  14. The ACLU is a creature of the Tribe whose name may not be mentioned.

  15. The ACLU had better hope the feces never hits the fan. Should that happen suspect they will be permanently put out of business.

  16. what about ‘bring yr daughters to work’ day?

  17. It’s the “U” in ACLU. Parasites. They’ll not beat the crap out of anyone else in my family. Unions are on the top of my lead poisoning list.

  18. Hmmm…maybe the ACLU can come to this guy’s rescue. ~

  19. Here they stick their leftist beaks in this too…