The Passing of the Great Race

The Passing of the Great Race

“While liberal worldviews are future- or progressive -oriented, conservative perspectives are more past-oriented, and in general, are interested in preserving the status quo.” the report says. “The far right represents a more extreme version of conservatism, as its political vision is usually justified by the aspiration to restore or preserve values and practices that are part of the idealized historical heritage of the nation or ethnic community.”
West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S., Washington Times, January 17th, 2003

There are a few truisms about “liberals” (“progressives”, “left-wingers”, “communists”, “socialists”—all of which can be used interchangeably) that bear highlighting before we get into the above ridiculousness.

First, liberals [intentionally] abuse language beyond all recognition. (It is this M.O., after all, that gave rise to the term “Orwellian”.) Consider “women’s health” (read: in utero infanticide); “marriage equality” (read: men marrying horses); “fairness” (read: confiscation of people’s earnings to buy votes); etc. And thanks to their (liberals’) control of the public education system, generations have been miseducated and indoctrinated to such a degree that this kind of b.s. flies.

So one thing we must always be suspicious of whenever a liberal speaks, is that they’ll be employing this forked-tongue abuse of language.

The first glaring example of this in the above quote is the use of the term “extremism.” Be on the lookout for just how much play this word gets in the MSM and by political pundits these days. Note it will always and only be applied to conservatives. Why? The first order of business of any totalitarian regime is to paint all opposition to it as “extreme”, thereby duping the useful idiots into believing their subjugation is the only “sober, rational” choice. And all totalitarian regimes are, by definition, far-left. Consider: How can a conservative (or, in liberals’ parlance, “extreme, fringe, far-right”) philosophy which, by definition, advocates for limited government and individual liberty, be totalitarian? So no, the Nazi’s were not “far right extremists.” They were socialists, just like the rest of 20th and 21st century radical left-wing totalitarians.

Another truism is that liberals come in two varieties: the manipulators, and the manipulated.

The manipulators are evil, using men as pawns to feed their lust for power, while the manipulated are simply delusional (courtesy either effective brainwashing or mere stupidity). It is difficult to determine whether the author of the above quote is the former or latter, but in either case, the absurdity of his contention about liberals being “future-oriented” while conservatives are “past-oriented” is easy enough to dissect.

Let’s start.

What are liberals’ two biggest platforms? Abortion and gay marriage (sorry—I mean “women’s health” and “marriage equality”).

Abortion. This means killing your offspring. Tell me, oh “party of science”: In what version of evolutionary theory does killing your own offspring lend itself to evolutionary advancement?

Gay marriage. This means not being able to biologically reproduce. Sure, thanks to advancements in reproductive medicine there are means like in vitro fertilization and surrogates and such by which two dudes can pretend to father a child, but there is no mixing of the couple’s DNA now, is there? So again, oh party of science, in which theory of evolution is the species advanced through pair-bonding over effectively cuckolded offspring? Has this ever been demonstrated to be an effective means of “evolutionary progress”? Certainly, as the party of science, there is ample evidence in your big quiver of scientific data to justify this urgent, sociological imperative of allowing sexual deviants to get married, right?

Of course there’s no scientific justification for doing what liberals demand we all accept; there is only their blinding hatred of Christianity (amongst other targets of their bitter hate) that leads them to insist we allow for the murder of babies and to honor any and all forms of sexual indulgence as perfectly normal.

Speaking of Christianity, I would further argue that eschatological religions (Christianity & Judaism in particular) are far more future-oriented than progressive’s secularism, which leads, invariably—invariably—to instant gratification, total self-indulgence, hedonism, etc.

Think about it: Both Christianity and Judaism have at their core a belief in “end times”, whereby one’s life must be lived with this future “goal” constantly in mind. Secularism, on the other hand? Well, that’s all bread and circuses now, isn’t it? I mean, what are the masses to do with themselves sans fear of heaven or hell or a just God? Oh, I know—internet porn!

So when conservatives argue against secularism and for a return to tradition and faith (Christianity or Judaism), it should be recognized, if one were being honest and aware of, you know, anything resembling reality, as being done out of a concern for the future of humanity. Liberals, on the other hand, while touting their dedication to the “future” and to “science” and “rationality” and “logic” and all other self-stroking descriptors, are really in it for nothing more than…you guessed it…absolute power, in the here-and-now.

How is that advocating secularism, which leads to hedonism, an agenda for absolute power? That was already discussed back here. But that’s only once pincer of the two-pronged attack of the totalitarians. The other is the slow screw turns of an ever more expansive, more invasive, and more oppressive statist regime.

Witness the establishment and extreme growth (in size and power) of federal agencies like the TSA, the NSA, the CIA, the FBI, DHS, ATF, DOJ, IRS, etc. Notice any similarities to every other totalitarian regime that has existed over the past century? You should—because there’s little light between what the United States of America is in 2013 compared to what the Soviet Union was in 1900’s.

What—the 1900’s? That was last century!

Yup. So the more the Liberal Establishment wraps its tentacles around the US population and its government and other power structures, the more we resemble a failed, century’s-old socialist state.

And this is a liberal’s conception of “future-oriented”?

Why yes—yes it is!

And lastly—let’s not kid ourselves about what the author is implying about this “future-oriented” vs. “past-oriented” Orwellian spiel. He tips his hand at “…idealized historical heritage of the…ethnic community.”

Translation into honest language? America’s going majority black and Hispanic, whitey, so deal!
And if you resist, you’re a radical, right-wing extremists who’s effectively a terrorist and therefore should be squashed by the power of the US military!

Ok, oh “party of science”: List for me all of the scientific and technological advancements brought to us by sub-Saharan Africans, Mexicans, and other such future Americans.

No, no—stop. I didn’t ask for excuse-making about the legacy of colonialism and racism and all that other happy horseshit. I asked for a list of scientific and technological advancements brought to us by blacks and Hispanics. Name them.

Any chart toppers—say, like, putting a robot on another planet, putting men on our lone satellite, inventing every form of telecommunication enjoyed the world over, advancements in transportation technologies, quantum dynamics, relativity theory, the human genome project, discovery of the double helical structure of DNA, neuroscience, modern medicine, computers, iPhones, flat screens, etc.? No? Nothing?

Oh…these were all done by whites and Asians.

So, in your (liberals’) “future-oriented”, “party of science”, “rational”, “logical”, “empirical” world-view, we should welcome replacing whites in the United States (not to mention throughout the rest of Western Civilization) with blacks and Hispanics because this will be to the benefit of human “progress”? This will be “the future”?

Tell me—based on your “science” and “evidence”, will this—the dispossession of whites at the hands of blacks and Hispanics—lead to a renaissance of scientific and technological output, or will the US quickly devolve—a la South Africa, Detroit, New Orleans, etc.—into a cesspool of tribalism, corruption, poverty, disease, and overall social pathology, without so much as a hint of advancement in science or technology?

Oh “party of science”, of “reason”, of “intelligence” and “logic”—pray tell, what do your “scientific models” predict?

Yes, certainly it is we who insist on a return to religiously-grounded principles, on a return to a respect for what got us here, and on the preservation of the white race as the majority population of the United States of America—certainly it is we who are not paying attention to the future; it is we who have no vision of what that future holds; and it is we who are hopelessly stuck in the past. Certainly it is liberals who are the champions of all good things to come, for only they have the wisdom to see the future clearly, and the intelligence by which to forge the utopia beheld in their infallible minds.

Idiocracy

There's that fag talk again...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

25 Comments

  1. Hey Red..great write-up. I read about the BS from West Point last night too. Glad you posted about this today. I was fuming when I got done reading it all. Who they include in this so-called study includes just about everyone on the right side of life…this is insanity, period!

    (0)
  2. Idiocracy is one of my favorite comedies. It is also a possible out come of the USA.

    (0)
  3. Cinnamon Girl says:

    There are many arguments that can be made as how to behave, at least to some extent, and how to advance society spiritually, scientifically, and economically.

    But it’s an insult at the very least to be told what you’re thinking and for another, HOW to think.

    Our ultimate freedom is freedom of thought. What follows thought is often, but not always, action. The way we act (or behave) when stressed, angered, or cornered is primitive and instinctive in both good ways and bad. But all actions have consequences. We can strive for fulfilling our carnal desires or we can rise above them and act with logic and reason. The latter qualities are NOT restricted to leftists or any -ists.

    Which is why it amazes me that the left would state that their way of thinking and even behaving is somehow logical and reasonable and the way of the right is somehow the opposite. Yet, from observations one can see that the left plays upon and gives into emotion and lets it have free rein while supposedly standing for rationality.

    As their favorite example, the left brings up Christian belief as being the right’s Achille’s Heel. I cannot help but wonder why they specify Christianity. In at least the last 600 years history shows us that the largest part of violence, oppression, and extremism, in other words, actions that are not logical or rational, comes from Islam and the lack of Christian values. (As I have stated before, I’m not a Christian but I do respect and abide in my own personal life by basic Christian tenets. Many of the Ten Commandments are simply an extension of the originally pagan Golden Rule).

    It confuses and often angers me and I am sure millions of others that one group has successfully vilified another to the point of extreme ostracization. What is their intention, their end goal? Can we surmise that it’s to control others through lack of hope, lack of faith, and lack of charity while essentially preaching that their social programs provide those very things, which, it has been demonstrated, is an empty lie?

    Those of us who are of a conservative or libertarian mind-set seem placed in the position of permanent defense, constantly explaining ourselves, warding off verbal attacks, and then finally laying on our backs like beta wolves.

    To get along at all with the leftists in our society is to acquiesce. So, who’s the real bully here? Who’s actually intolerant? It’s as plain as the nose on one’s face.

    Sometimes when I write like this I realize that I’m not that dissimilar to head-in-the-clouds liberals who wish for an impossible Utopia. The difference between us, though, is that I’m not into FORCING that Utopia.

    (0)
  4. speaking of bad behavior by liberals…

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/50508812

    I guess he need wasnt getting paid enough to run his “chocolate city”

    (0)
  5. Snake Oiler says:

    Why the Founding Fathers Matter

    December 26th, 2012 by Tom DeWeese

    It has become typical in school text books, in public discussions, and in the smug wisdom of Progressives, to diminish the words and actions of those who led the founding of the United States. However, now that the nation has gone through what Al Gore called a “wrenching transformation” away from limited government, free enterprise, and individual liberty (all major ingredients to making the US the freest and most prosperous nation in history) it’s time to listen again to their wisdom.

    Thomas Jefferson warned us to …

    Avoid Sustainable Development: “When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become as corrupt as Europe.”

    Avoid the Welfare State: “The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.” “I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.”

    Avoid Massive Government Debt: “It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.”

    Avoid Government Over-regulation: “My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.”

    Avoid Control of Individual Gun Ownership: “No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.” “The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.”

    Avoid Compulsive Taxation of Income: “To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.”

    Avoid the Federal Reserve: “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property – until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

    Keep the Founding Documents Intact: “May (the Declaration of Independence) be to the world, what I believe it will be, to some parts sooner, to others later, but finally to all, the signal to assume the blessings and security of self-government.” His last written words June 24, 1826

    The Founding Fathers are irrelevant? Every one of these issues is in the forefront of today’s political debates. Our Founders understood government and its dangers to our liberty. They feared it above all other threats and tried to create a system of self government through which we could protect ourselves from its tyranny. When their warnings are ignored we get Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and a government of lies, oppression and national bankruptcy.

    http://americanpolicy.org/2012.....rs-matter/

    (0)
  6. Mr. Grumpus says:

    I fear it’s gotten way too late in the game to repair our government and it’s legion of looters. It has crossed my mind once or twice that, just perhaps, an EMP detonated over our land could be just the ticket. In my opinion, all of the technology created by white man(and jews) has just made life way too easy for looters and tyrants. Yes, it would be awful for a while as people relearned how to be self-sufficient and live by barter and contract, but it wouldn’t take very long for the looters to get right or get put down. We would still be safe from invasion, because the militia is still the best armed force the world has ever known. It would suck for all who have lived right and saved for their future, because the fiat and electric money would mean nothing. So, I wish there was a great answer for that problem, but I can’t seem to think of one. The sad truth is that we’ve been sold down the river by the one-world socialists, and the money is all an illusion. Anybody not busy at work right now, please feel free to expound or argue further on my theory.

    (0)
    • Snake Oiler says:

      The country went on the road to ruin with the establishment of a permanent political class. Exacerbated by such things as lobbyists, a corrupt and agenda driven news media, etc..

      (0)
    • Mr G,yes it would be awful. We would experience a “Die Off” of up to 2/3 of the population in the first 6 months. It would be of Biblical proportions. And frankly I’m not discounting it as a possible future scenerio. Iran has already conducted military exercises of firing missles from “container ships” and supposedly is working on an EMP/Nuke weapon.
      Have you read “Two Seconds Later”?

      (0)
      • The book is called, “One Second After” by William R. Forstchen.

        A great and chilling read. Synopsis: The United States suffers through the after affect of a coordinated EMP strike. Its fictional, but all the technicalities of an EMP strike and the aftermath appear on all accounts to be dead on.

        (0)
  7. Spurwing Plover says:

    To these micro-brain liberals a extremists is anyone who refyses to turn in their guns or who opposes ABORTION,ILLEGAL IMAGRATION,SUPPORTS THE THE U.S. CONSTITUTION opposes same sex marrage belong to the NRA and who refuse to ecept OBAMA as their dictator becuase liberals are idiots

    (0)
  8. Well HeeHaw I’m a Redneck Racist now, and in the future I will evolve into a “idealized Ethnic”, and if I just admit my latent racism, I can be “born again” as a second class citizen, and maybe work up from there. I wonder would I be required to give up my earthly possessions to The State? Ya know like those Bible Guys did to the Church back in the olden days, before rocks and dinosaurs, and Iphones.

    Redstater I enjoyed your article as a response to enforced PC, however I must say I subscribe to the thinking everyone can make a contribution, and sometime the contribution may not be quantifiable by preset standards. But then again maybe that is Liberal brainwashing from earlier days, so you pose interesting questions.

    (0)
  9. While listening to Rush today,a woman who wants to be a teacher was explaining what is required of her. She is white so she has to “admit “that she is racist. This is being taught to kids of all races in our schools. If you are white you are to be hated.

    (0)
  10. let justice roll says:

    The sad state that this Country is in today started a long time ago. It started just like a child with baby steps in the beginning. Welfare was the beginning of the end for America as it once was. When we no longer asked people to be responsible for their own existence and the Government started taking care of our needs the handwriting was on the wall. No one spoke out against welfare because after all, we needed to help those less fortunate than us,even if it made them dependent on our own government for their very existence. As the numbers grew and grew and the people became less productive their demands became bolder and bolder. Now this assistance is considered to be an entitlement program, leading one to believe that those on it deserve to be taken care of as if they had done something important to be cared for. The liberal left has seized upon this notion and have used this mentality to heard the masses to follow them and perpetuate their socialist agenda. This can only continue to happen if we the conservative thinking people sit by and do nothing to stop this madness. It is time to stand up in one voice and put an end to the demise of this once great Nation before there is nothing left to save. Kick them out or vote them out either way they need to go.

    (0)
  11. Snake Oiler says:

    The Real Root of School Violence

    January 11th, 2013 by Tom DeWeese

    In the brave new world of the very near future, children will enter their public schools passing police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, metal detectors, X-ray scanners and warrantless physical searches. Parents will relax, knowing their child is now “SAFE.” No violent evil doers will be able to get past that wall of security.

    But what none of the checkpoints, scanners and cameras will detect is the child who walks right past, armed to the teeth with a hidden weapon actually enforced on him by the school itself. The weapon comes in many names and varieties: Ritlin, Luvox, Prozac, Zoloft, Cymbalta, Paxil, and more. Each weapon lovingly loaded into their child by concerned parents before they send them off to their “safe” school. And while the child’s backpack and pockets are checked by the armed force on the way in, the pharmaceutical poison is building up in his blood system, racing to the brain like a lit dynamite fuse.

    As communities reel from one massive act of student violence after another, most recently in Newtown, Connecticut, the nation looks for answers. How many are looking at the schools themselves as the conduit through which millions of students are drugged with mind-altering drugs?

    http://americanpolicy.org/2013.....-violence/

    Sometimes I wonder which came first – the cure or the disease?

    (0)
    • Snake Oiler
      Was watching a discussion on tv a few yr’s back on this very subject, one educator said that the problem of drugging children could be reversed if a simple thing as recess was brought back, allow the child to run wild on the playground would do wonders to calm many of those that are being drugged.

      (0)
      • ga steve – I hope you are doing well, friend. As you have mentioned, that would do wonders. Times have certainly changed – if you can’t fix it with a pill, better break out the medical marijuana.

        (0)
    • Here is the best list of drug caused shootings, stabbings and violence I have seen yet, back over a decade.http://www.ignatius-piazza-fro.....-violence/

      (0)
  12. Snake Oiler
    Doing as well as can be expected in these times, thanks for asking, I bookmarked the link you provided and am going to make a copy of it and give it to my state senator, he sits beside me in Sunday school so he will be served with this information, we usually have a few min’s for discussion before class starts so he has no choice but to hear what I have to say, I am raising a 7yr old great niece that came out of the womb wide open as a case knife and the teachers wanted her mother to use the drugs on her, she refused to do so, I can see the potential in this child and believe in time she will settle down, I give her more free rein than any one else here at home and have an easier time controlling her because of it, If she wants to splash in the mud puddles and get filthy it’s ok, roam the woods and fields its ok too, kids need to be allowed to be kids cause they sure got a screwed up world waiting for them.

    (0)
  13. Great post! Love the LC video. Spending the eve listening to him, kinda forgot about him with all goings on.

    (0)
  14. Sleazy 1%er prick…

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/.....10966.html

    And this ain’t the Al Jazeera deal either. This one really reeks.

    (0)
  15. Mr. Grumpus says:

    I haven’t Al, but I will look into it just as soon as I get done firing off a few rounds in the morning. I’m gonna try for deer, but if that fails I’m just gonna sling some lead to remind the tyrants that we’re armed.

    (0)