AWD has come down with a bad case of the “I’m lazy as sh*t this weekend and wouldn’t even breathe if I didn’t have to” virus. I’m about to head out to the pool to let the sun bake it out of me while I re-re-re-read 1984 while having an ear-gasm to some fine Merle Haggard on ye olde iPod.
So I was looking back at posts from years past instead of having to think of something new. Here’s one from back in 2010 when AWD was starting to give thought about the separation of the red states (good guys) from the blue states (comm-a-nist bastids). I believe I speak for many when I say the corrupt federal government is broken beyond repair. Even if we had leaders who wanted to fix it (which we don’t), it would take generations. It ain’t gonna happen. Too much corruption, too much debt, too little Constitution, too little smarts. Just like in society…too much sex, too little Jesus. It ain’t gonna turn out good!
Please weigh in on whether you think America will last another 10 years. I’m going to the pool.
America is changing and not for the better. We are moving further and further from what the founding fathers created. Our border protection is a farce as illustrated by 20 million third world moochers now on our soil. Fast breeding illegal immigrants are dropping new American citizens (thanks to the outdated 14th Amendment) every nine months while more illegals enter the US everyday. They then live on our ridiculous welfare systems.
Blue states are in financial ruins as the citizens who voted for the socialistic programs that ruined them are leaving and heading to still solvent red states. More wealth is being taken by our federal and state governments from the sweat of producers and being given to moochers. This week, Obama and the Democrats gave another $32 billion in unemployment payments to the unemployed. Sounds benevolent but someone has to pay the bill. That would be the over-worked, over-taxed producers who struggle t stay above water and off government benefits!
Has the time come for conservatives to start planning the division of America? With illegal immigration and the possibility of amnesty coupled with the cradle to grave legions of welfare moochers, will conservative producers revolt and decide to create our own country? Why should red states be forced to bail out the wild spending Californians and New Yorkers? Are conservatives prepared to lose their country by being out-bred by Democrat-voting immigrants and their offspring? If current trends remain intact, in a decade or so Republicans will never win another election in most states.
In an article posted at Amnation, the argument is made for partitioning the country by red and blue states. Some of the reasons for the division is because of the differences in political ideology between conservatives and liberals. The author say of the blue states:
What sort of society are the Blues aiming for? Obviously, they do not all hold identical political views. By and large, however, most of them want the United States to become more like the “socialist” countries of Western Europe such as Norway, Denmark, Sweden, and Holland.
* Most Blues strongly favor significant redistribution of wealth, partly by a steeply progressive income tax, and partly by other means.
* Most of them are internationalists and multiculturalists.
* Most of them are opposed to deporting (or removing by attrition) the millions of illegal immigrants now in the United States, and indeed wish to continue large-scale immigration of non-Europeans into the United States.
* Despite paying lip-service to the idea of constitutional government, the Blues never let the Constitution get in the way of policies they favor, but instead constantly interpret it to mean whatever they wish. Of numerous possible examples, here are four:
(a) Most of them strongly approve of the decision by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade, a decision that overturned all existing state laws on abortion. (While one might believe that such laws were ill-advised, there is certainly nothing in the Constitution that prohibits them.)
(b) Perhaps even more extreme was the decision in Wickard v. Filburn (1942). Filburn was a farmer who had been fined by the government for planting too much grain on his land, thereby violating a federal law which had been passed under the auspices of the interstate commerce clause. Filburn pointed out that he had not sold the grain, but rather had used it himself, and that therefore his activity was not “interstate commerce.” The court ruled against him, on the grounds that his non-commercial use of his own grain on his own farm “affected” interstate commerce, and therefore came under Congress’ power to regular interstate commerce! By so greatly expanding the reach of the interstate commerce clause, the decision almost eliminated the restrictions placed on the powers of the federal government by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution.
(c) Most Blues seemed quite ready to push Obama’s health care bill through by a vote “deeming” the Senate bill had passed without the House of Representatives ever taking a direct vote on the bill. (Faced with public outrage, the House leaders eventually backed down on this procedure, but not because they had any constitutional scruples concerning it.)
(d) The majority of Blues approve of the federal and state governments mandating racial quotas and preferences, even though such laws clearly violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
* Despite their claims of being opposed to racism (often expressed very sanctimoniously), the majority of Blues are, by our standards, blatant racists. That is, they strongly favor laws and policies—such as racial preferences and quotas—that deprive some persons of jobs, promotions, college admissions, and scholarships just because of their race. These preferences and quotas were first instituted in the mid-1960s and have gradually become more and more pervasive.
* Despite paying lip service to the notion of freedom of speech, in practice many of the Blues often favor censorship laws of various sorts, such as laws banning “hate speech,” and repressive “speech codes” on college campuses. These speech codes—usually adopted by a vote of the faculty (typically a very “liberal” group)—provide a clear indication of the way most Blues view the right of free speech and what is in store for us if they triumph.
We don’t want to live in a country dominated by such people, and we don’t want to bequeath such a government to our children. For that matter, the Blues don’t much like us either. Many of them consider us to be racists, religious fanatics, stupid, heartless, and corrupt. It is, therefore, time for a divorce. Just as a husband and wife with irreconcilable differences are often better off divorcing, so the Reds and the Blues would be far better off if we split into two separate countries.
I must say it has crossed my mind what would happen if producers decided to form their own country and not allow moochers to enter. Every day I see more and more license tags from California, Florida and up north while driving in Dallas. Yesterday, my son and I were in the car when we saw a black woman driving a car with New York tags and Obama stickers plastered all over her vehicle. I told my son “that cancels out my vote.” After leftists have destroyed their lands by voting for stupid socialist laws, they flee those wastelands as fast as possible to do the same in red states that have exercised fiscal responsibility.
I have often thought Texas should have a wall on the northern border as well as the southern one. Liberal immigrants from the ruined blue states will bring their votes with them and destroy us. It’s not too far away.
Unless drastic cuts in the size, cost and strength of our federal government, eradication of illegal immigration and a return to a culture that rewards producers, America is finished!
Read this article and tell me what you think.