Michael Savage hasn’t always impressed me much when I’ve listen to him now and then over the years…but when I heard him pontificate the other night, I about came unglued about what he was putting out on the airwaves via radio. He’s either an intentional liar looking for attention, or completely stuck on stupid! Either way, he simply doesn’t know what he’s talking about regarding the Zimmerman case. He evidently hasn’t followed the trial either. He obviously hasn’t done any research himself into what was truly said by Zimmerman, he doesn’t know anything about the firearm used in the shooting and how it really works either…but hey, he acts as if he does and that’s that according to him. And last, but not least…he had to play the race-card game and call Zimmerman a racist to-boot! – Which is just not the truth, but Trayvon Martin surely was according to what Rachel Jeantel testified to. So, I call Michael Savage an outright liar, but that’s just me.
See what you think about what he said, see if you can see anything to disagree with or not. – This is via DC:
On his show on Tuesday night, talk show host Michael Savage said that George Zimmerman, who is currently on trial for the murder of Trayvon Martin, should be found guilty of second-degree manslaughter based on two things: 1) The state of his firearm and 2) The language he allegedly used on a 911 call when he was first reporting his suspicions about Martin.
But first Savage explained why his insight should be valued over others in the media covering the trial.
“I’m about to break an analysis that no one yet in the media has done, as you would expect from me — being the senior member of the American media and possibly the most insightful,” Savage said. “And I have to blow my own horn because everyone else tries to break my horn.”
“I will tell you that I broke the case down as follows,” Savage continued. “You want to hear it, or don’t you want to hear it? I know your mind is made up: White people generally think Zimmerman is innocent, except for liberals who are sure he is guilty; black people probably to the 99th percentile are sure Zimmerman’s a murderer. So where does Michael Savage fit in? I’m an independent observer and I call them as I see them, and I think Zimmerman committed what he’s being charged with: manslaughter. He didn’t intend to kill him, but he may as well have intended to kill him.”
Savage laid out his case, saying that the murder could have been avoided, but based on Zimmerman’s gun having a round in the chamber with the safety off, Zimmerman intended “to find some he could shoot or intimidate.”
“Zimmerman was carrying a Kel Tec semi-automatic 9mm handgun,” Savage said. “So? Big deal. It is a big deal because he had a bullet chambered in the gun and he had the safety off… Had he not chambered a round prior to meeting Trayvon, and had he not taken the safety off, even if Trayvon, during the altercation even if Trayvon had tried to grab the gun away from Zimmerman — had that gun not been chambered with a round and safety off, Trayvon Martin would have had to use two hands. You can’t do it with one hand.”
“Many of you don’t own guns,” Savage said. “He would have had to let go of Zimmerman. He would have had to stop punching him. He would have had to take both hands on the gun, hold the pistol grip with one, pull the top back to chamber a round and then he would have had to unlock the safety, during which time the mixed-martial-artist-in-training Mr. Zimmerman would have had time to throw him off and pound the hell out of him. But because Zimmerman carried a loaded weapon with the safety off, Trayvon Martin is dead. Therefore, the responsibility is in the hands of Zimmerman.
“I don’t care which side you are on,” Savage continued. “He wasn’t just carrying a gun, he wasn’t just a watch guy: He was hunting. He was looking, he was hoping to find someone he could shoot or intimidate with that loaded weapon, ladies and gentlemen of the Savage jury.”
In addition to that, Savage said the controversial 911 call was also damning.
“[Z]immerman says the back entrance and under his breath, he can be heard saying ‘f-ing,’ and the first word is ‘f—ing;’ the second word begins with a ‘c’ and ends with ‘ns,’” Savage said. “I didn’t make that up. It’s on the 911 tape. And I’m afraid that the fact that he has this racist statement — made this racist statement on the 911 call — and that he was carry a loaded gun with a bullet in the chamber and the safety off, you have to find this man guilty of second-degree manslaughter is my opinion. Something’s wrong with this whole story.”
That 911 call was debated back in March and April 2012, with some saying Zimmerman said “f**king coon” and others saying it was “f**king cold” or “f**king punks.”
The Zimmerman topic starts about the 3:00 minute mark, lasts until about the 9:30 minute mark or so, listen below:
Now folks, if Savage had bothered to follow the testimony before he opened his yapper, he would know for a fact that Zimmerman said ‘f**king punks‘…but he didn’t bother.
If he knew anything about the firearm used he would know this, this is from a commenter at the post, but it has been stated during the testimony that took place already during the trial: “As an owner of the Kel-Tec PF9, I can say that Savage (whom I normally generally like) is a fool. There is no safety on this weapon. It has a 2 stage trigger with a long and heavy trigger pull. This acts as a “safety” and is the most common trigger on concealed carry firearms. Also, I don’t know anyone who carries that doesn’t keep a round in the chamber. If you are attacked, you have no time to rack your slide and chamber the round. I am shocked at Dr. Savage’s lack of knowledge on this subject.”
And for Savage to say in the video about Zimmerman’s head wounds and such regarding the medical examiner’s testimony the other day, it would have done him well to read this or at least done some research before he opened his ill-informed pie-hole on this subject as well:
‘Medical examiner who called Zimmerman injuries ‘insignificant’ no stranger to controversy‘ – Angela Corey anyone?
And for Michael Savage to join the Sharpton’s of the world playing the race-card game is beneath contempt, in fact…despicable!
You also have to wonder if Savage understands what the Castle Doctrine/Stand Your Ground laws mean…because it sure doesn’t seem like he does to me, how ’bout you?
So, what do you think…do you agree with Savage? Or do you have a message you’d like to send him, and if so, what would it be?
Fire Away – Inquiring Minds Want to Know!