Dudes and dudettes…are any of you familiar with the name Michael Shrimpton? Have you ever heard that name mentioned before anywhere? If not, you’re certainly not alone. Well, it seems in this case, he appears to have important information about just who the real Barack Hussein Obama is according to a report that will follow shortly. This seems to be no laughing matter, this is now in court and the trial may reveal information that could be explosive in more ways than one.
All I know is, this sure seems to be a stretch via my viewfinder in life, and I’m a birther…a proud one at that! Then again folks, I sure as heck could be wrong. See what you think about this information via this report. Make sure and pay attention to every word included in this piece…simply because it does make one sit back and think about many things, including evidence that BHO’s mother isn’t really who we’ve been told she is. Stop and think about it, have we ever seen any pictures of his mother pregnant with him anywhere in the time frame she was supposedly carrying him? If so, please share it with us.
Fasten your seat-belts…off we go!:
In a groundbreaking development that has been ignored by virtually all other media outlets, WorldNetDaily published a bombshell report that could tear apart Barack Obama’s carefully crafted backstory.
Despite attempts to marginalize so-called “birthers,” millions of Americans remain unconvinced that Obama was truly born in Hawaii as the administration claimed.
That doubt is not confined to the U.S., however, and one British man is doing his best to disseminate what he believes are the facts regarding Obama’s true origins. Jerome R. Corsi detailed the current legal battle London lawyer Michael Shrimpton currently finds himself in – and how it could ultimately lead to the revelation that Obama was born in Kenya.
WND.com reports Shrimpton was in court recently for a hearing regarding charges that he sent a baseless warning to the British government about a 2012 terrorist attack that never occurred. According to the article, he claimed German agents smuggled a nuclear weapon from a Russian submarine that sank in the Barents Sea 12 years earlier.
He claims, however, that intelligence information being withheld would result in his acquittal upon being released to the court.
WorldNetDaily was reportedly the only media outlet present during the hearing despite – or perhaps because of – the fact that this case could blow the lid off of Obama’s much-disputed birth story.
In a surprise move, however, the trial was postponed until November. This would mean that any potential damaging testimony against Obama would not surface until after the midterm elections.
As Corsi reports, Shrimpton first presented allegations that Obama was born in Kenya, and to a woman other than Stanley Ann Dunham, during the 2008 election cycle. In a video made during that period, he laid out a string of charges supporting his position – including the accusation that Dunham was not pregnant the month before Obama’s ostensible birth.
Conceding he is no doctor, Shrimpton said he believes medical professionals would agree that “if a lady’s giving birth in August, we like to see her pregnant in July.”
He also contends that a clandestine CIA investigation failed to find a match between Obama’s DNA and that of his supposed maternal grandparent. According to his narrative, Obama was actually born in 1960 to one of his father’s mistresses in Mombasa, Kenya.
Evidence exposing this cover-up, he concluded, would be in the possession of British intelligence, since Kenya did not achieve independence until 1963.
These and other claims are expected to resurface during Shrimpton’s upcoming trial, WND reports. While it appears they will not be investigated prior to the midterms, this case is one worth watching closely as it has the potential of forever changing American history.
What do you think about all of this. Just another smokescreen, another conspiracy, or a serious matter that should be paid attention to in the coming months?
As a side-note to all here: I know full well about Jerome Corsi and the vendetta he’s been on when it comes to BHO’s real birth…including where he was really born, his birth certificate and all that jazz. I’ve known about this for quite awhile before Dear Leader was elected. I still keep up with much of it, as many of you might do as well. – But when it comes right down to it…at this point, what difference would it make!? Think about it, even if it were ever proven that Dear Leader is a fraud, an illegitimate president…what would congress do about it? What would courts do about it? Plus, I don’t even need to ask what the majority of the mainstream media would do…we all know that answer!
And to top it off, if it were ever proven to be true that Barack Hussein Obama is nothing but a community organizing fraud put in place via enemies within behind the scenes (think George Soros)… those that agreed with the proof found would be called nothing but red-necked racist, domestic terrorists!
What say you? – Fire Away…Inquiring Minds Want to Know!
I’ll leave with this: