THE RELIGION OF MURDER STRIKES AGAIN!
DON'T NEED THEM IN THE USA
Every time the topic comes up, Angry White Dude states he has never seen one positive thing come from Islam. I realize that each religion has it’s nuts but nobody comes close to the sheer percentage of wackos than Islam, the religion of murder. When I heard there was a shooting at Ft. Hood, the first thing that popped into my head was Muslims. Even though it was an army base with an extremely low probability of Muslim terrorists, that was my first thought. Chances are you had the same thought too. This is the lunacy we have come to expect from Muslims. Just this afternoon I read about the Taliban blowing up a girls school in Pahk-ee-stahn. About the two hundredth (I’m serious) school blown up in the name of Islam…the religion of murder.
It’s become pretty apparent to AWD that Islam doesn’t work too well in the civilized world. At least the Western world. I realize Muslims have so many petro-dollars they can build ski resorts in the desert and ostentatious palaces…but at heart they are still savages. Just because a savage drives a solid gold Rolls Royce doesn’t remove him from being a savage. The government and mainstream media can pretend Islam is not a major problem in the United States because of suicidal political correctness. The supremely idiotic State Department can continue to let in Muslim “tourists” and “students” and Obama can spend $20 million of our tax money to relocate Palestinian Hamas tools to the USA, but Americans will pay with our blood!
AWD believes every non-citizen Muslim needs to be deported immediately. I shouldn’t have to explain why. If an Muslim American Major can kill American soldiers on a US military base, how safe are we from Muslim terrorists in malls, schools and grocery stores? Say what you want but stereotypes come from somewhere!
Here’s the article on the Taliban blowing up schools:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jlU1aLFMT8vTp38k0sfpIi5gU8bA
I take the Missus out for a nice dinner and a movie and all I could think about was getting back home to rejoin in this discussion! I guess that indicates how boring of a date I am. Anyway…
KHM, I’m a bit more sanguine about things (but only a bit), but I do agree that there is a need to caution against possible genocide/ethnic cleansing, which would just be a complete and total disaster. What’s most aggravating is that this kind of ethnic tension is EXACTLY what the multi-culti’s had in mind when they started the whole thing with the Immigration Reform Act of 1965. Anyone not think the ultimate destruction of the USA has been behind much of the libtard agenda for the past century or so?
Which leads to Hillbilly Jack’s spirited defense of the Christian character of this nation–a sentiment with which I am in 10000% agreement. The Constitution, after all, was just a formalization of the existing Christian principals of individual freedom, etc., etc. As John Adams noted: “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” 100% accurate, IMHO.
Anyway, I’ve had a few martinis and am more garrulous than usual. Off to bed for me. ‘Night, gentlemen…
Oh, and in the spirit of things, I just wanted to leave this here:
“Gentlemen may cry, ‘Peace, Peace’ — but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” — Patrick Henry
Oh, and this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-C3BH6QQTY
Just watching Fox and Freinds. They had some muslum woman on. The bottom of the screen said:
“Family: Shooter taunted due to his religion.” And the Fox and Freinds gang and the filthy mulsum woman started talking about how he was taunted as a muslum in the military.
Im finished with fox news. This shooter got his degree from the military. He was a ranking officer. I am now convinced that somebody is trying to pull the wool over my eyes. Portraying this scumbag as a victim is all I can take.
To me, it is some coincidence that that shooter is a muslum, and the victims are military people at a Army base. Some coincidence.
I cannot understand why we have to be fed this pablum. Maybe they are trying to avoid an uprising. Because based on what I have been reading on the internet, a lot of people are pissed.
Tazzmax,Paradox and Red Stater NYC
I would like to express my gratitude,to each of you,for your collective words of support.
Your solid moral conviction,and unwavering defense of what used to be common place truth,heartens me.
Thank you..
Hillbilly Jack
“Gratitude is not only the greatest of virtues, but the parent of all others.”- Marcus Tullius Cicero
Again,my thanks.
Semper fi, Hillbilly Jack, et al.!
KHM, keep up the healthy debate. Frankly, I can’t stand that the national debate we’ve been having for the past few decades has been between true Americans and traitors (i.e., far-left liberals/anarchists/communists/etc.). We need to eradicate the leftist/anti-American ideology and get back to civil debate amongst people with opposing viewpoints but nevertheless a common ground of love and respect for this great nation.
@KHM:
“Moral relativity is when you judge a crime as more or less severe depending on the group affiliation of either the victim or the aggressor.”
Wrong again oh pompous one! Moral relativism (as the term is typically used) refers to saying that Christian fundamentalists are no better or worse on whole, as Islamists. Or “one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.” Count yourself proudly among the likes of that other “great thinker” – Rosy O’Donnell (gee that must make you proud).
To sarcastically equate workplace violence with an act of Jihadi terrorism as you did, is utterly ridiculous. Especially when the military KNEW this guy was a problem, and had been warned repeatedly. Moreover, he was a member of a notoriously high-risk demographic (oh gee, we can’t use our brains and kick the guy out, he hasn’t mass murdered anyone yet).
What you “hardcore libertarians” don’t seem to comprehend (and it’s one of the reasons you are an endangered species), is that military personnel are NOT strictly covered by the Constitution. They are under the Code of Military Justice. They are entrusted with a certain level of trust in security matters, given access to military installations, weapons, etc.
Thus, the Army SHOULD HAVE booted Abdul the Camel Jockey to the curb when it became clear he was a high risk powder keg. But “wise ones” such as yourself decided he had a “right” to threaten to kill other soldiers, and were too frightened to take the non-politically correct action of removing him from military service.
Everyone knows this is true. Even thumb-twiddling do-nothings like you. As Abraham Lincoln said: The Constitution is not a suicide pact.
One other thing I’d like to add:
Equating an act of terrorism like the one at Ft. Hood with a banal act of workplace violence is analogous to saying that the conventional bombing of Tokyo during WWII, was “equivalent” to the nuking of Hiroshima because the same number or more people were killed by the former. The significance and implications of the two events could not be further away from each other. And to deny that difference is pure ignorance.
Yet that is exactly the type of reasoning that people like KHM use. Well gee, some guy shot a place up, and we have a body count, so lets compare. Hmmmm, its almost the same as this other incident, so they must be equivalent. We don’t need to consider the circumstances, the motivation, the culture and policies that spawned it – nope! Just stick our heads in the sand and treat it like any common street crime! And then we’ll say that anyone that disagrees is a borderline “ethnic cleanser”.
Sheesh! What stupidity. Get real kiddies.
Here you go dudes. In case you needed more evidence that terrorism and workplace violence are different things:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npAvM-VWwhc&feature=player_embedded
And another:
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/199503.php
Guess the Ft. Hood killer is an inspiration to Jihadi Jawas all over the world.
@snodog
from wikipedia:
“In philosophy moral relativism is the position that moral or ethical propositions do not reflect universal moral truths (neither objective nor subjective). Instead, moral relativism makes claims relative to social, cultural, or historical circumstances.”
I believe I was correctly describing moral relativism, in my example the relativism was due to historical circumstances (slavery). In your example it is cultural circumstances (christian vs muslim).
I still say that the killing of a completely innocent person is the worst form of murder and the motivations of the person committing that act have no bearing on the severity. In fact I think it would make you morally relative to say that you can distinguish between two acts of murder of a totally innocent person.
I don’t think we should have a standing military at all so the problem of kicking out potential jihadis goes away completely.
You are right about Japan in WW2 as far as not being able to equate Tokyo and Hiroshima. It follows from my moral objective position of not being able to differentiate two murders of totally innocent people. In this case most of the people killed in the conventional bombing of tokyo presumably were not totally innocent (i.e. mostly soldiers, workers in war supply factories, …). Most of the people killed in Hiroshima were non-combatants which would make them if not totally innocent at least more innocent than those that died in Tokyo. Therefore even if the same number of people died in both it would be easy to say that nuking hiroshima was worse.
very disturbing video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WhHYiWCm8Gs&feature=player_embedded