Advertisement

BRUCE JENNER HAS THE BALLS TO BE ‘WOMAN OF THE YEAR’

Advertisement

OH DEAR GOD!

OH DEAR GOD!

Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner has been named Woman of the Year by Glamour Magazine. Predictably, ugly liberal feminists (redundancy alert!) are in a little tizzy because…because…well, because that is what they do!

Why do feminists oppress Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner as Woman of the Year? Don’t they support transgender/transexual/transfreakydeaky people? Feminists shouldn’t oppress Bruce Jenner for being a beautiful 6’4″ woman with big, succulent breasts and a big ol’ unit and cojones. God made him that way! And a lot of surgery.

AWD understands the ugly leftist feminists and their frustration that a woman with a weiner is Woman of the Year, I guess. Until Bruce/Caitlyn loses his beans and frank, he could always revert back to being a man. I think. I get so confused.

But there are so many more deserving women who could be honored as Woman of the Year instead of Bruce/Caitlyn. Like this woman:

CHRIS-HAYES

That is MSNBC’s Chris Hayes moments after giving birth. Something Bruce Jenner will never be able to do.

While only a symbolic pathetic figure of ObamaCare, this woman is a tribute for all who want to mooch off taxpayers and would lose a fight with their kid sister. The classic liberal woman:

pajama-boy-screenshot-640x480

This is the liberal wet dream of the Modern Man/Woman. What that means, I have no idea. I get so confused these days with this sh*t.

Isn’t it ironic that liberal woman who shrieked the loudest about everyone accepting Bruce/Caitlyn as a woman are now complaining the loudest now that he is considered to be a woman? Albeit with a man thing. But woman enough to be named Woman of the Year.

AWD suggests Glamour Magazine name a much more deserving woman as Woman of the Year:

drag1

Maybe Woman of the Century!

Advertisement

Related Posts