AWD, Electioneering, Illegal Immigration, In The Press, Islam, Politics, Random Posts, RINO of the Week, War on America

HERE’S WHAT I DON’T LIKE ABOUT RAND PAUL

Advertisement

I SHALL RELEASE....WOGER!
I SHALL RELEASE….WOGER!

AWD so hoped Rand Paul would be different. He showed promise. Less wild-eyed wackjob fanatic than his father, he at first appeared to be more pragmatic and marketable than Señor Batsh*t Crazy Ron Paul. He could have been Mr Tea Party. He’s just the latest George W Bush. Pity.

As hard as he may try, deoxyribonucleic acid is something not easily defeated. Especially when your DNA has a majority of the enzyme CRAZY swimming in it. Yeah, yeah, Paulbots, Ron Paul had some good ideas. Where did it get him or us? It’s just that he comes across as a weird little dude who wears wrinkled cheap suits with tennis shoes. That’s because he’s a weird little dude that wears wrinkled cheap suits with tennis shoes. I’ve met him. You haven’t. OK, OK, call me a neocon. Paulbots use the word “neocon” more than Al Sharpton uses “racist.”

Something got to Rand once he got to Washington. It’s called the Republican Establishment. Winning his seat because of huge support from the Tea Party movement, Rand now had to choose which of two masters to serve. He chose poorly. But predictably. He kissed the ring of the Establishment. It happens to nearly all of them.

Rand lost many conservatives by endorsing Mitch McConnell during his reelection campaign. That was a real stupid move. You’ll note that Ted Cruz did not endorse McConnell’s fellow waste of oxygen John Cornyn. But Rand thought he’d get some ass-kissing points in with the Establishment boys if he played along and endorsed a lifetime corruptocrat that supposedly stands for everything Rand supposedly opposes. Again, he choose poorly. The Establishment gobbled up Rand’s endorsement and now back El Jeb Bush for the 2016 nomination.

Rand then began pandering for hard-core Democrat votes. He promised to return the right to vote for convicted felons, most of whom are black. He pandered in front of black audiences at black colleges telling them how government had failed them and he would fix that.

Rand even joined the Crips in Los Angeles to pander to violent drug gangs. I just made that up but it’s not far off the radar of Rander the Panderer’s ability to smooch the boo-tays of those who will NEVER vote for him or any Republican. Many have tried, all have failed.

Rander also made a huge mistake by trashing Donald Trump. Rand’s conservative fans have abandoned him and his Establishment-pandering self and moved on to wildly support Trump and Ted Cruz. Predictably, Rand has gone nowhere. As El Jeb found out, pissing off the base is not a valid methodology for winning support from the base.

Trump has figured out that the American conservative taxpayer is beyond being sick and tired of illegal aliens, Islam, welfare moochers, weakened defense, etc. That is why he will be the next President. Rand Paul wants to return the right to vote to Democrat-voting felons. Good luck with that strategy, Rander.

Now Rander’s big money supporters are tiring of his act. He is polling just above Benedict Arnold and has big money problems. Go figure. Maybe he should hit up Mitch and the boys for some coin. Oh, they’re still throwing away their Big Business millions on El Jeb and won’t return Rander’s calls!

AWD guesses Rander will end his laughable presidential campaign within a month and go back to being bought off by the Establishment boys in Washington. If he plays his card right and continues to kiss the right soft, lumpy asses, Rand can look forward to a rewarding lifetime of being a Senator and living with the fact that he sold out his supporters and his country.

This is the problem with too many Libertarians (if Rander can still be called that). Too many are concentrated on little debating societies among themselves that achieve nothing or they are batshit crazy. Or both. I think it’s really that a great many Libertarians just want to smoke pot. Might as well, they never achieve anything anyway.

Maybe Rander IS a Libertarian.

Advertisement

35 Comments

  1. Quartierleblanc

    He was always just a bit crazy and now he’s off his meds.

  2. Rand is just cannon fodder for the others running for Pres.
    No one will beat Donald Trump.
    So,, you should be now voting as to who his VP will be?
    Maybe Ted Cruz?

    • God forbid it will be that Fruit Loop Ben Carson. This nut job actually believes that the holocaust could have been prevented by armed German citizens, that straight people go into prison and come out gay, and that those people in Oregon should have attacked the shooter instead of acting like frightened sheep.

      • Jena,
        Actually the best defense in a shooting situation is to attack. I speak from some experience. The shooter is going to be thrown off his game if you go for him. You will remember that a shooter took on a theater in Louisiana over the summer. His mistake was doing this in a Southern city. The men in the theater charged the shooter and significantly limited the number of deaths. Another example can be gleaned from shooters during the troubles in Ireland. Some started shooting only to be overwhelmed by the crowd. I don’t know much about Carson, but I do know that he is intelligent and he is not Hillary, or Bush, or any of the other nut job establishment types.

        • david7134
          A Confederate Gen once said that when you are surrounded, out gunned and the situation is hopeless the thing to do is charge.

          • Would that be Nathan Bedford Forrest,my hero?
            I’m asking.
            As in the military(Special Forces),when in an ambush,charge!
            I agree with this…”The man who does not exercise the first law of nature—that of self preservation — is not worthy of living and breathing the breath of life.” – John Wesley Hardin

        • I saw a defensive shooting DVD which advocated where if the assailant is pointing a gun at you, do everything you can to mess up his aim such as stepping to the side of his aim.

          (BTW, Jenna is being ironic… Hee Hee…)

    • Cruz hopefully!!!

  3. Bland Paul’s downfall was directly attributed to attacking Trump. Any grass root Tea Party support he had was lost after that. Throwing his support behind Mitch McTurtle and morphing into a full fledged RINO didn’t help Rand’s cause either.

    Debate #2, first question to Mr. Trump:

    Moderator: “How can you assure the people that you have the temperament to be President?”

    Mr. Trump (turns to Paul): “You shouldn’t even be here, you are at less than 1%, there are too many people on this stage to start with.”

    This was an overlooked classic Trump performance and effectively ended Rand Paul’s Presidential ambitions.

    Trump 2016 🙂

  4. ‘Paulbots use the word “neocon” more than Al Sharpton uses “racist.” ‘ Heh. I hear that!

  5. disgusted Caucasian

    I agree 100% with the OP. All Trump has to do is stay on message with the illegal alien invasion issue and continue to point out that the establishment, on both sides, is corrupt. In my business circles, I know several Demorats. They are disgusted with Obama and tell me that they are ready to vote for Trump. If trump gets the nod…he’s our next President. However, I’m afraid the two parties will close ranks and pull a JFK on Trump. It is a similar situation unfolding here.

  6. So you surrogate pretty boy Rand for libertarians, then turn your sights toward ….whom? What’cha up to Dude? You fronting for RedStater? You be triangulating like LBJ on three days of Jack, Coke, and Pallmalls. I’m scratching my head, but can’t wait to see where you are headed with this. You got my clicks.

    • Your avatar of yourself tells me all I want to hear from you.
      Yeah,,,Barry Sotero smoking dope.

    • Wes, hope you’re doing well. I’m lighting up a gin martini for the first time in a long while tonight and figured I’d mosey on over to the old AWD page and see what’s shaking. To add to the debate, I agree with AWD’s closing remarks on Libertarians (capital L). I generally consider myself a libertarian (of the paleo variety), but damn if the lot of them don’t just seem like they’re hopelessly lost in political theory. Frankly, with what little time I spend thinking about politics these days, my mind completely skips over all political theory and goes right to foundational thinkers (namely, Plato and Nietzsche). I haven’t had any time to flesh out, let alone organize, my hunches, but I’m thinking I’m going to end up favoring a political ideology that is less about freedom and more about winning wars of aggression, pillaging the losers, and raping their women.

      • “I’m thinking I’m going to end up favoring a political ideology that is less about freedom and more about winning wars of aggression, pillaging the losers, and raping their women.”

        You’re converting to Islam then Red? 😉

      • Good to hear from you brother. I hope you continue to explore your interest in the classics and share your insights in writing from your POV. I expect great things from you and your family. God go with you.

      • I’ll leave with this:

        “The last man…is a term used by the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in Thus Spoke Zarathustra to describe the antithesis of the imagined superior being, the Übermensch… The last man is tired of life, takes no risks, and seeks only comfort and security.

        The last man is the goal that Western civilization has apparently set for itself. After having unsuccessfully attempted to get the populace to accept the Übermensch as the goal of society, Zarathustra confronts them with a goal so disgusting that he assumes that it will revolt them. The lives of the last men are pacifist and comfortable. There is no longer a distinction between ruler and ruled, strong over weak, or supreme over the mediocre. Social conflict and challenges are minimized. Every individual lives equally and in “superficial” harmony. There are no original or flourishing social trends and ideas. Individuality and creativity are suppressed.

        The society of the last man would go against the theoretical Will-to-Power, the main driving force and ambition behind human nature; as well as all other thriving life, in the universe. Nietzsche said that the society of the last man would be too barren and decadent to support the growth of great individuals. The last man is possible only by mankind’s having bred an apathetic creature who has no great passion or commitment, who is unable to dream, who merely earns his living and keeps warm. Alternatively, the last man could also be brought about by a league of strong individuals who somehow are coerced into corrupting their own power structure. The last men claim to have discovered happiness, but blink every time they say so.”

        Wikipedia

      • Right on,brotha’!!!

      • Lawd knoes da trubble I’b seen.

  7. Rand was holding his own in the Republican race at the beginning. Then he disappeared. He went on some trip to a foreign country doing some medical work for charity (if I remember correctly). When he returned he was never the same. He seemed to have lost his passion for the presidency. He seemed more ‘establishment’. I believe he read the handwriting on the wall. Though he had some good ideas at first, he did not turn the proverbial corner in vote gain and knew this was not his time.

  8. he can’t exit the race soon enough for me………………fu_k’n sell-out………………..

  9. Spurwing Plover

    Anyone who is for illegal imagration and the Dream Act is a traitor and no longer deserves to live in america

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*